Sunday, September 9, 2007

Binh Danh exhibit

Binh Danh is recreating one of the most emotionally powerful news articles during the Vietnam war.
 the way that he redid the pictures helps to make the connection between the soldiers and
 the war stronger by using leaves that came from the jungle. viewing these photos and their 
original versions reminds me of some of the different news agencies doing the exact same 
thing for Iraq war except that they have a record for the entire war and not just one week. CNN and the New York Times both have a list of deaths from the Iraq war. the 
CNN version is more like the original Life magazine article with the faces in a year book style 
while the NYT version is artistic in that the photos of the dead make up a collage of one of 
the dead soldiers. even though Binh Danh was to young to remember the actual war it has 
affected him greatly. He is trying to convey a neutral view at the cost of war that cant be 
replaced.
i viewed the exhibit more as just portraits of people in a new and inventive way than dead 
soldiers from the Vietnam war. Sontag believes that there are two attitudes about what is 
material for the camera. the first is that anything photographed has either beauty or 
interest and is therefore art. the second is that everything needs to be photographed so 
it can be analyzed later on. Sontag states that "According to one attitude there is nothing 
that should not be seen according to the other there is nothing that should not be recorded." 
i agree with her that every photo is either art to someone or a document to be reviewed. i also believe that something 
can be both and that is what i got out of it. it is an art work that people can look at for purely 
its artistic value and be amazed at the detail that he was able to extract from the leaves. 
it is also a document that exists to be looked at later so that we dont forget these mistakes 
and remake them in future.       

1 comment:

Fereshteh said...

RICK
WHATEVER WORD PROCESSOR YOU ARE USING HAS DIFFERENT FORMATTING FROM THE BLOG SO SOMETIMES YOUR LINES GET CUT OFF AT THE END. CAN YOU CONVERT TO PLAIN TEXT BEFORE PASTING OR JUST WRITE YOUR ENTRIES DIRECTLY IN BLOGGER? THANK YOU.

Binh Danh is recreating one of the most emotionally powerful news articles during the Vietnam war. HOW DO WE KNOW THIS?
the way that he redid the pictures helps to make the connection between the soldiers and
the war stronger by using leaves that came from the jungle. GOOD viewing these photos and their
original versions reminds me of some of the different news agencies doing the exact same
thing for Iraq war except that they have a record for the entire war and not just one week. CNN and the New York Times both have a list of deaths from the Iraq war. the
CNN version is more like the original Life magazine article with the faces in a year book style
while the NYT version is artistic in that the photos of the dead make up a collage of one of
the dead soldiers. GOOD OBSERVATION, WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR YOU/THE READER? even though Binh Danh was to young to remember the actual war it has
affected him greatly. He is trying to convey a neutral view at the cost of war that cant be
replaced. HOW CAN WE TELL THAT IT IS A NEUTRAL VIEW?
i viewed the exhibit more as just portraits of people in a new and inventive way than dead
soldiers from the Vietnam war. YES, GOOD! TELL US MORE ABOUT WHY. Sontag believes that there are two attitudes about what is
material for the camera. the first is that anything photographed has either beauty or
interest and is therefore art. the second is that everything needs to be photographed so
it can be analyzed later on. Sontag states that "According to one attitude there is nothing
that should not be seen according to the other there is nothing that should not be recorded."
i agree with her that every photo is either art to someone or a document to be reviewed. ARE THOSE THE ONLY 2 OPTIONS? DO THEY HAVE ANY OVERLAP, AND HOW? i also believe that something
can be both and that is what i got out of it. it is an art work that people can look at for purely
its artistic value WHAT SIS THE DIFFERENCE BW ARTISTIC VALUE AN DOCUMENTARY VALUE? and be amazed at the detail that he was able to extract from the leaves.
it is also a document that exists to be looked at later so that we dont forget these mistakes
and remake them in future. SO WHAT MAKES THEM DIFFERNET FROM THE ORIGINALS IN LIFE MAAZINE.